Effects of Home Care on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.

Background and Aim Treatment with sorafenib causes diverse side effects, which limits adherence. This work assesses whether Home Care, a psychosocial nursing intervention, prolongs the duration of treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and if it influences health-related quality of life (HRQL). Methods and Results This is a cohort study using data from patients receiving sorafenib in the prospective Bern HCC Cohort at the University Hospital. Duration of treatment, overall survival, and HRQL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary questionnaire were compared in the two groups. A total of 173 patients were eligible for the analysis. Among them, 141 were in the Home Care program, and 32 were not. Patients with Home Care had a significantly longer duration of treatment (265 days vs 152 days, P = 0.003) and a better functional well-being (17.7 vs 12.5, P = 0.015). Conclusion Psychosocial interventions such as Home Care are a valid method in improving adherence to sorafenib and can therefore be recommended

Combined treatments in hepatocellular carcinoma: Time to put them in the guidelines?

The time for battling cancer has never been more suitable than nowadays and fortunately against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) we do have a far-reaching arsenal. Moreover, because liver cancer comprises a plethora of stages-from very early to advanced disease and with many treatment options–from surgery to immunotherapy trials–it leaves the clinician a wide range of options. The scope of our review is to throw light on combination treatments that seem to be beyond guidelines and to highlight these using evidence-based analysis of the most frequently used combination therapies, discussing their advantages and flaws in comparison to the current standard of care. One particular combination therapy seems to be in the forefront: Transarterial chemoembolization plus ablation for medium-size non-resectable HCC (3-5 cm), which is currently at the frontier between Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification A and B. Not only does it improve the outcome in contrast to each individual therapy, but it also seems to have similar results to surgery. Also, the abundance of immune checkpoint inhibitors that have appeared lately in clinical trials are bringing promising results against HCC. Although the path of combination therapies in HCC is still filled with uncertainty and caveats, in the following years the hepatology and oncology fields could witness an HCC guideline revolution

Microwave ablation in the treatment of liver tumors. A better tool or simply more power?

It has been a long time since tumor ablation was first tested in patients with liver cancer, especially hepatocellular carcinoma. Since than it has become a first line treatment modality for hepatocellular carcinoma. Over the years, the indications of thermal ablation have expanded to colorectal cancer liver metastases and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma as well. Together with the new indication for ablation, new ablation devices have been developed as well. Among them microwave ablation shows potential in replacing radiofrequency ablation as the preferred method of thermal ablation in liver cancer. The debate whether radiofrequency or microwave ablation should be the preferred method of treatment in patients with liver cancer remains open. The main purpose of this review is to offer some answers to the question: Microwave ablation in liver tumors: a better tool or simply more power? Various clinical scenarios will be analyzed including small, medium, and intermediate size hepatocellular carcinoma, colorectal cancer liver metastases and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Furthermore, the advantages, limitations, and technical considerations of MWA treatment will be provided also